Barak: Assad nearing end of reign in Syria Oh yes they do! Remember Iran and everyone's conflicting desire for a new Middle East (dis) order?
Defense Minister Ehud Barak says Israel should not fear Syrian president being replaced; 'Changes in Mideast hold great promise for Israel's children and grandchildren', He is sadly mistaken. He is dismissing Iran the elephant in the room. They are not going to allow Syria their only ally to fall to Democracy.
As you know, Bush used 9/11 to ignore Afghanistan and attack Iraq to help Israel establish a buffer zone and their idea of a new middle east order. We have illustrated that numerous times with the official Government Perle Wurmser Report. However, I ran into something that got by me in 2006. Iran is not going to sit for this and I hate to say it but they are right to take us on. Iran is not going to sit still, they were freed up by Bush to fight for their version of new middle east order and they will not be deterred easily.
Obvious plan aside what the idiot did not think of when they attacked Iraq was that they freed up Iran to instigate for their version of new Middle East order. As you know I have said it too many times but it will end up in total disorder and a total Middle East breakdown. If we are lucky we will avoid WW3 because China, the US, and Russia know what that would mean to each other and the future of the world.
Anyway before Bush (Cheney) went after Iraq he had designs on Syria, Lebanon, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt when all is said and done. We are all observing age old hatreds play out and Sunni against Shiite, Persian against Arab hate is only serving to make a already volatile region and situation worse.
The Perle-Wurmser policy document demanded: 1) Destroy Yasser Arafat and the Palestinian Authority, blaming them for every act of Palestinian terrorism, including the attacks from Hamas, an organization which Sharon had helped launch during his early 1980s tenure as Minister of Defense. 2) Induce the United States to overthrow the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. 3) Launch war against Syria after Saddam's regime is disposed of, including striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and targets in Syria proper. 4) Parlay the overthrow of the Ba'athist regimes in Baghdad and Damascus into the "democratization" of the entire Arab world, including through further military actions against Iran, Saudi Arabia, and "the ultimate prize," Egypt. a clean break
That plan was formulated in 1996 before they found a fool to push it through in 2003. I knew about that but did not know about this. The term “New Middle East” was introduced to the world in June 2006 in Tel Aviv by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. She is credited with coining the phrase. I am disturbed with the role she played because she sat on chevron's board before she became Secretary of State to push Bush's plan through. We have discussed that and her and Cheney's role in energy and Afghanistan in the past and will again but for now:
The “New Middle East” project was introduced publicly by Washington and Tel Aviv with the expectation that Lebanon would be the pressure point for realigning the whole Middle East and thereby unleashing the forces of “constructive chaos.” This “constructive chaos” –which generates conditions of violence and warfare throughout the region– would in turn be used so that the United States, Britain, and Israel could redraw the map of the Middle East in accordance with their geo-strategic needs and objectives
She described Israel's attack on Lebanon as birth pains in establishing the new Middle East and was rightly criticized for it. As Bush was when he described the attack on Iraq as a crusade before recanting his truth, the truth was often spoken accidently and denied. The “New Middle East” project was introduced publicly by Washington and Tel Aviv with the expectation that Lebanon would be the pressure point for realigning the whole Middle East and thereby unleashing the forces of “constructive chaos.
” This “constructive chaos” –which generates conditions of violence and warfare throughout the region– would in turn be used so that the United States, Britain, and Israel could redraw the map of the Middle East in accordance with their geo-strategic needs and objectives. This supposedly new map was prepared by retired Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”
He use to appear on Fox a lot but I have not heard from him of late. Anyway the map is the one pictured but there is no way it is going to happen. Bush freed Iran up to pursue her version of a new Middle East order. This most definitely will be war, a total middle east breakdown at the very least
Finding those plans for a new Middle East map now makes sense of Iran's belligerence and drive for nuclear power and advanced weapons to take us on. Can Israel really be naive enough to think that Iran will let Assad fall or allow Syria to fall to Democracy? This is only going to end in war period but how confined is the only question!
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
http://anaverageamericanpatriot.blogspot.com
7 comments:
The detailing in this piece is great, because alot of details I dont have ... as far as this "new" Middle Eastern thing, I just get tidbit's of news here and there, put 2 ad 2 together and come up with my idea's. Show how behind I am Jim ... I didnt even know about the phrase Mew Middle East, or that Rice coined it, or that Rice was formerly on Chevron's board .... then you have folk's like Cheney ... damn, ole Fuzzy (Bush) just left the gate's wide open when he took office! This new Syrian mess is another mega- mess it look's like. Back a few year's ago after we invaded Iraq and Arminejhad (cant spell that damn name for anything?) started selling all them "woof" ticket's as mouthpiece and "First Flunky" for that Imperial Raghead Council of Iran, I was ranting ... "that SOB has his nerve" ... all we done for Iran over the year's, not to mention the invasion of Iraq(?) ... was one of the biggest favour's we done for Iran ... he didnt talk all that shit when Saddam was in power. But this is really some deep shit we all are into, the way I look at it Jim ... kind of serve's us right too, I mean ... we created alot of this shit as far as alliance's and decade's of ass kissing, etc, beside's ... even though my grandma was one of the German Jew's ... I never liked the idea of the State of Israel being re- established after WW2, Hell ... I would have gave the Jew's West Texas or a state of their own elsewhere's, but not in the middle of a pit bull arena (like putting French Poodle's in an arena of Pit Bull's) full of ragheaed's who despise the year's of Judeo- Christian hassle's they had centuries ago .... beside's ... it's been centuries since that was Israel, I meant ... if we were all about giving culture's back their ancient land's, let's just give America back to the Indian's, etc ... this is all crap, pop culture crap at that, as far as what were told to believe.
Thanx for the info Jim ....
RC I am convinced we (mostly the Brits) have created this entire mess in the middle east and Africa as I am sure you read my links in the past.
There is never going to be peace in the middle east. As you know, it was always fragile! I have to agree with Ahmadinejad that if we felt so bad for the Jews we should have given them part of one of our countries. ( oh yeah I forgot to add that the Baja Peninsula is still available and would solve a lot of ills in the middle east, the US, and in Mexico) What do you think? Baja Peninsula
That would solve a lot of problems! We created that mess too! We do not have clean hands in any geopolitical situation in the world.
Ahhh ... shit Jim! ... the Baja Peninsula? That is beauty beyond paradise down there! I didnt even think about that. Jim ... it just aint gonna happen, and I think even some of this has to do with religion, after all, our culture's are smothered in our religion's and value's. Jew's and the West all know that if the Jew's werent in Israel, that the great temple's and history of Judeo Christianity may be destroyed too, for me Jim, I wouldnt have any problem with it, I'm not religious. But I was actually on this new post about the Palestinian State thing you have, so I'll cut this here ...
Also Jim ... I have alwayz believed you can have peace there or anywhere's ... but we arent at that level of civility yet as a species across the board, that is why we still need the defense type's we still have. I have let's say ... vision's of a future society too, and we are far from it brother!
I know it is RC and it is largely wild. It would never happen but it should have been thought about in 1947. Things would be a lot different all around right now if they did.
We did not need him to say it because it is common sense but Nostradamus gave us 2 roads into the future, one to peace and prosperity and one to war, pestilence, and destruction. We are bound and determined to take the latter. There will never be peace in the middle east or around the world because man is not smart enough to ignore his wants and do the right thing.
Post a Comment