Friday, October 19, 2007

Coming to Israel's rescue, the water wars, or Bush's forever wars, which will be the excuse to Declare martial order and finish our America off?


The excuses to steal the last remnants of our America are stacking up! For years now to much ridicule for whatever reason I have said that Bush will attack Iran before he can be stopped and he would most likely use coming to Israel's rescue to do so. His excuse use to be to stop Iran's nuclear aggression. With the bombing task being 1,200 sites, the task enormous, and the public against it, Bush came up with another reason to attack Iran. He was going to use precision strikes to take out Revolutionary Guard interests that were killing American's. That was something the public would fall for as they did in Iraq.

However with the world lining up against him as well as an increasingly hostile democratically controlled Congress, Bush will not stop and in following his unbending new world order we have other fears and concerns now and have to only wonder what excuse Bush will use in order to Declare Martial Law and cancel elections so he can keep his abusive Presidential powers, attack Iran and embroil the entire world in his new world order Forever Wars? He is getting more desperate by the day!
This gets worse and we are closer to world war and martial law every day. We discussed the world coming together in order to take on Bush and stop him from attacking Iran and further his militaristic warmongering in Russia unites the world against Bush

Well, as you know Bush wants a permanent military presence in Iraq and the middle east to me until he can find the excuse to attack Iran and further his middle east order but now we have Putin upping the ante as expected. Putin used a live Russian TV and radio broadcast to criticize U.S. policy in Iraq, which he said was aimed in part at seizing oil reserves. The Russian leader's latest broadside against U.S. foreign policy came during his annual question-and-answer session with the Russian people.

Putin said the American battle in Iraq was "useless" and "totally counterproductive" because it was against the Iraqi people. It is against the Iraqi people but it is so Bush can attack Iran and further his middle east order and it isn't useless!
Putin said he agreed with President Bush that U.S.-led coalition forces should only withdraw once the Iraqi government was in full control of the country. However, he said the lack of a deadline for withdrawal meant there was no impetus for the Iraqi leadership to take control of the security situation. That I am afraid is part of the plan.

"It's totally unacceptable to keep occupation forces there forever," he added. He also repeated his warning against U.S. efforts to put elements of a missile defense system in Eastern Europe and confirmed his plans to step down from the presidency next year. I have to agree with Putin there too but what he doesn't realize is those MDS are designed to supply Bush the excuse to have to fight and implement his new world order. Putin demands Iraq pullout date

You know a pullout date will not happen though Russia and the worlds anti Bush rhetoric is ratcheting up. Like Congresses increasing anti Bush rhetoric it too will not matter to Bush and for a reason.
In a heated floor speech, Stark repeatedly made the charge that the president would rather use government revenues to send U.S. soldiers to war than to pay for low-income kids' health care. A longtime war critic, Stark said the president couldn't find $35 billion to expand SCHIP but at the same time had requested an extra $200 billion to pay for military operations in Iraq.

"Where are you going to get that money? Are you going to tell us lies like you're telling us today? Is that how you're going to fund the war? You don't have money to fund the war or children. But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old, enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement," Democratic Senator Stark said.
"President Bush's statements about children's health shouldn't be taken any more seriously than his lies about the war in Iraq. The truth is that Bush just likes to blow things up in Iraq, in the United States, and in Congress. I urge my colleagues to vote to override his veto," he continued. I happen to agree with Stark but look at exactly what he said and the irresponsible Republican Partisan response

Anyway amidst the increasing rhetoric from the world and Congress it will not make Bush change his destructive course but Bush's anxiety is beginning to show.
Bush's comments at his Wednesday news conference only fueled the discussion and may have also signaled a shift in his personal redline in Tehran's progress toward a nuclear weapon. With most attention focused on the doomsday scenario he invoked, another part of his answer may be telling. Although in the past he has said it is "unacceptable" for Iran to possess a nuclear bomb, Bush said Wednesday that it is unacceptable for it to even know how to build a bomb.

The talk of military options has led to sometimes feverish speculation that a strike may be imminent, a notion dismissed by administration officials who say that Bush is committed to diplomacy at this point. But with 15 months left in office, Bush may eventually confront the choice of dealing with Iran's program or passing the problem onto a successor. For now, the White House spent yesterday trying to douse the flames of Bush's news conference remark. "If you're interested in avoiding World War III," he said, "it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon." Bush is getting more desperate in his excuse for war with Iran

I will guarantee you as I have for years to no avail that Bush will not be dissuaded from his original reason for attacking Iran to get our military in the middle east and that is to attack Iran. and that is only one of his original plans and he will stop for no one or nothing. Remember Perle Wurmser A clean Break
World war three will happen and it is necessary to implement the plan Bush has been following from day one, Russian Doctrine of Destruction

It may be the right thing to do but an Iraq pullout date will not happen! Bush will not be dissuaded from attacking Iran and furthering his Forever Wars that the world has allied together to fight. It will happen and soon and then Bush will declare Martial Order so he can stay in power and head his WW3 new world order, Forever Wars. I am a bit disappointed that I have been trying to get every politician and media outlet in the country to wake up and realize what is being done to their country, why, and how this will end up.

I am peeved because Robert Rouse received a copy of the video I was sent and I hope he can include it with this on The Blog World Report because I do not have the know how but Ralph Nader has a video where he describes it is worse than we thought and that Senator Olver said impeachment is off the table because Bush is going to attack Iran create havoc and Declare Martial Law as I have been telling my Senator John Olver for years. I am peeved, Why the hell haven't these idiots listened and stopped this instead of doing nothing and letting this unbelievable crap happen? What about the next generation?

James Joiner
Gardner Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com

14 comments:

PoliShifter said...

Wow, Senator Olver actually said he thinks Bush will attack Iran and declare martial law?

If this is true, I'm glad at lease some in government are aware of how grave this situation is.

Meanwhile Paksitan, a country with a nuclear arsenal where Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are likely actively seeking a nuclear weapon, continues to slide into unrest.

Yet Bush is more concerned over Iran, a country that doesn't even have nukes.

The fact that Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are still in operation 6 years after 9/11 should make all the right wingers seeth with anger but it doesn't.

Larry said...

Don't tell us Martial Law isn't on it's way:

Heavily armed paramilitary mercenaries from the Blackwater private security firm, infamous for their work in Iraq, are openly patrolling the streets of New Orleans. Some of the mercenaries say they have been "deputized" by the Louisiana governor; indeed some are wearing gold Louisiana state law enforcement badges on their chests and Blackwater photo identification cards on their arms. They say they are on contract with the Department of Homeland Security and have been given the authority to use lethal force. Several mercenaries we spoke with said they had served in Iraq on the personal security details of the former head of the US occupation, L. Paul Bremer and the former US ambassador to Iraq, John Negroponte.

"This is a totally new thing to have guys like us working CONUS (Continental United States)," a heavily armed Blackwater mercenary told us as we stood on Bourbon Street in the French Quarter. "We're much better equipped to deal with the situation in Iraq."

Blackwater mercenaries are some of the most feared professional killers in the world and they are accustomed to operating without worry of legal consequences. Their presence on the streets of New Orleans should be a cause for serious concern for the remaining residents of the city and raises alarming questions about why the government would allow men trained to kill with impunity in places like Iraq and Afghanistan to operate here. Some of the men now patrolling the streets of New Orleans returned from Iraq as recently as 2 weeks ago.

What is most disturbing is the claim of several Blackwater mercenaries we spoke with that they are here under contract from the federal and Louisiana state governments.

Blackwater is one of the leading private "security" firms servicing the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. It has several US government contracts and has provided security for many senior US diplomats, foreign dignitaries and corporations. The company rose to international prominence after 4 of its men were killed in Fallujah and two of their charred bodies were hung from a bridge in March 2004. Those killings sparked the massive US retaliation against the civilian population of Fallujah that resulted in scores of deaths and tens of thousands of refugees.

As the threat of forced evictions now looms in New Orleans and the city confiscates even legally registered weapons from civilians, the private mercenaries of Blackwater patrol the streets openly wielding M-16s and other assault weapons. This despite Police Commissioner Eddie Compass' claim that "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons."

an average patriot said...

Polishifter
First I want to say yes, Anon sent me, Robert, and maybe you, the video. I have seen it at enigma's and other places. I do not have the know how or I would have included it. I know they will send it to you, but yes he did say that and that was a Ralph Nader video.
Now what pisses me off about him saying that is that he is my Senator ansd I talk to him, Kennedy, and everyone else I can, frequently. I have been trying to wake them all to reality for years to no avail or so I thought.
Amongst other things I
have told him exactly that. My problem is that if they do realize this what the hell are they doing rolling over instead of announcing it and actively trying to stop it like the rest of us. Someone of consequence has to act we are rapidly running out of time.

an average patriot said...

Larry
you are a wealth of information and always a pleasure to talk to. What stinks is that as you know, Blackwater is not the only company and they will be used more widely soon.
I might have told you but I caught Blackwater's president saying security needs in places like Iraq would be decreasing and Blackwater would be diversifying into other areas.
The Nazi's had theirs and this is Bush's strong arm unit. Very scary as all this will be to our demise and it is being done right under the noses of our so called leaders.

PoliShifter said...

Hi Jim,

thanks...

Is this the video?

Ralph Nader: "Things Are a Lot Worse than We Thought!"

I found it on YouTube.

PoliShifter said...

So Olver thinks if the Dems impeach Bush, that Bush will bomb Iran and initiate Martial Law?

It sounds like a threat Bush would issue...But regardless, why are Democrats such cowards?

Do they really think the American People are going to tolerate Martial Law and a Monarchy?

PoliShifter said...

Oh yeah, it's Rep. Olver not Senator Olver. He's the Dem Rep for MA's 1st Congressional District.

an average patriot said...

Polishifter
Yes that's it! I am just disgusted that I have written him many times and he has helped me out in the past. But now I see this and he does nothing to prevent it. Not just him but I have wri8tten every Politician and media outlet I could contact.
I would hope the people don't just accept martial law and worse but I see it happening. I dio not se the backbone it takes to stand up. And yes, I caught myself too late, I noticed my error. Olver is my Rep!

mirth said...

Vital post, Jim, and clearly presented. I'm still reading.

Nothing yet has moved US citizens to decisive opposition action.
If martial law comes, it will be packaged in such a way that the majority of us will accept it.

an average patriot said...

mirth
Always honored to hear from you. The excuses for it are building and I hear some who say Americans will not stand for it but I beg to differ. I will fight but I do not see backbone in enough people to make a difference.

Larry said...

The Democratic chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee is prepared to play hardball with President Bush over funding the war in Iraq.

Rep. David Obey (D-WI), who has pledged to sideline the latest Pentagon funding request until next year in addition to proposing a tax hike to finance the war, says he’s not letting anything — even Democratic leaders like Speaker Nancy Pelosi — get in his way.

Obey, who told the Washington Post that he hates the “misbegotten, stupid, ill-advised” war, pushed past Speaker Pelosi’s objections to his plan to levy a tax to pay for the war, the paper reports.

“I went to Nancy a week before we did it, and I told her: ‘Nancy, I’m gonna do two things,’”said Obey, according to in the Post. “One of them you’re gonna like, and one of them you’re not.”

Pelosi, who favored Obey’s idea of not addressing war funding this year, took issue with his war tax plan.

“Just as I have opposed the war from the outset … I am opposed to a war surtax,” she said of the plan at the beginning of the month, and more recently stated that she didn’t think that “an across-the-board tax was a fair one…we don’t go forward lightly when we’re talking about a tax on all the American people.”

an average patriot said...

Larry
A war tax, I don't like that idea myself. Especially when you know the truth about all this crap.
I was listening today how the chief idiot once more is victorious and has made Dems look like fools and they are relenting on the Iraq war. I am so sick of this crap. Bush is flat out an underhanded two faced lying shit!

-=Topper=- said...

Once in a while I get the question, "who you voting for president" and my response always gets that look. The response is "if there is one".

I'm holding out for all of this to come to pass. That there will be reason, Bush will find it and he will stay president.

The view does get that look, but then again, Bush has signed many a law that green lights quite a lot of it.

But the view that the US wouldn't stand for it get "that look" from me due to one astounding thing.
The shit box is still president.

Just astounding.

-=t=-

an average patriot said...

topper
Sorry but I just noticed this. I know! it is not a popular thought on kos but some agree! I am afraid if the election isn't stolen again and Giuliani isn't elected to stay this war course then Bush will pull a Musharraf! Take care!