Tuesday, September 11, 2007

9/11 was not the defining moment of our time,that event has not occurred yet ,up to now and all our horror Bush has been, but ?


I honor all the victims of 9/11 and our nation and the world as we battle so called terrorists but primarily the negative consequences of Bush's new societal, middle east, and world order.
9/11 was just one tragic act that began with the implosion of the Soviet Empire. Ancient tribal rivalries (often wrapped in religion) have inspired nationalistic forces fighting to regain historic territories from the Balkans, to Africa, to the Middle East, and beyond as we all know. This is true!
However, 9/11 was allowed to happen so Bush could get us and the world behind what he calls a war on terrorism. Think of all the powers he has been given and how he has abused them in his real goal of new societal, middle east, and world order. 9/11 was merely the excuse used to prosecute his new middle east and world order. If fighting terrorism was his goal he would have stayed in Afghanistan and attacked Pakistan who we know was funding Atta and the 9/11 attacks.
Instead he is in cahoots with Pakistan to prosecute the so called war on terror. Instead he used 9/11 as an excuse to attack Iraq and further destabilize the already unstable middle east. Last year we heard U.N.. Secretary-General Kofi Annan say leaders of Middle Eastern nations believed the Iraq war has "been a real disaster" for the region. It is but it is a plan we have discussed many times, not pure ineptitude.
Most of the middle east leaders rightly believe now that the invasion of Iraq and its aftermath has been a real disaster for them. They believe it has destabilized the region. it was by design and I hate to tell them that it is still just unfolding and will get a lot worse. They are right to be worried, they are next!
Bush must stay the course and for a reason they don't know! Iraq is in civil war and it will spread throughout the entire middle east. Think about the events in proper context then tell me what you think! 9/11 was Bush's pearl harbor. Problem is, Bush is no FDR and has squirreled away any sympathy the world had for us. His true goal has come to light but we are powerless to stop it! As you may remember, Bush was looking for something to happen that would put the country and the world behind what he already had plans to do. 9/11 gave him that something.
He had plans right from the beginning to establish a new societal, middle east, and world order. That is why it was important to him to whip up a media and public fury which of course, he has done and adeptly continues today. He then used the excuse of 9/11 to attack Iraq and unsettle the middle east so he could further his idea of a new middle east and world order.
In doing so he guaranteed the loss of Afghanistan as well as Iraq and the entire middle east Of course lying all the while and whipping up as much support and frenzy as he could in the media and minds he controls.At this point it behooves him to continue to ignore reality and continue to whip up a frenzy so he can continue staying the course in order to further prosecute his new middle east and world order.
We are all shamelessly being used so Bush can follow his plan for new order. Who knows what Iraq and Afghanistan will be like in a year or two? Plus I will guarantee you Bush will find an excuse to attack Iran so he can further his plans for the middle east and the world and he is well along with that plan too. Any way you look at it Bush has screwed up and just made a bad situation worse, as usual. His new middle east order will happen but it is out of his control!
Bush chose to ignore this as we have said many times with all other good advice so he could attack Iraq and start to implement his idea of a new middle east order. This is only part of the equation! It will proceed and he won't admit it but it is out of his or anyone else's control!
Anyway, The fall of the Russian Empire set in motion something that began with the founding of Islam in 610. Islam was established by Muhammad in order to give Muslims a formal religion and sense of belonging with the Jews and Christians. It failed and Muslims have never been able to gain equal footing or be willing to accept their role in the worlds society.
The Christian Crusades to take back Jerusalem turned into a blood bath against Muslims. Our nation was born during the enlightenment and industrialization completed a gap between our societies which will never close. Next comes the Berlin Conference in the 19th century, allowing Europe to divvy up Africa which they then took what they wanted and then reset the boundaries creating another mess with the Muslim world.
This is not though, a fight between the west and Islam. Islam is also fighting itself! It is a war between Islam and the world at large, everyone. As Bush has no tolerance of anything but his version of perverted Religion and Democracy. The Muslim Islamists have no tolerance of any other version of Islam than their own. They want all their lands back which can not happen. They want us off their lands so what does Bush do? He attacks Iraq and attempts to set up his idea of a new middle east order.To all our demise their is no desire for compromise here by anyone!

There is an easy answer to this and that is too fight and continue to fightand that includes Bush! There is no easy way out though. We have no other choice as none of this will be quelled by diplomacy. Average muslim's of all nations want peace and prosperity as average citizens of every nation do but our so called leaders have taken it upon themselves to fight and destroy our peace and prosperity.
Iraqi's are killing each other as we know,but Bush knew they would and ignored all good advice and intelligence to the contrary, as he had to in order to stay the course and prosecute his idea of new order. What no one seems to understand is the so called war against terrorism in the end will only be half of the war equation of the future still unfolding. Reagan was credited with stopping the cold war but it just went underground and has now resurfaced. Reagan started this Neocon crap to me and Bush is merely finishing the job he started by belittling every country in the word and attacking Iraq unsettling the middle east.
As a result, with 2/3 of the world belonging to the non-aligned Nations and the enemies Bush has awakened wanting our demise by virtue of his superiority complex and destabilization of the already unstable middle east which we also contributed to by injecting Israel into the mix and again resetting boundaries as we saw fit, again ignoring traditional boundaries and dislikes we have a still developing major conflict that Bush says we did not start when in fact we did. I do agree with Ahmadinejad when he said if the countries of the world felt bad for Jews after WW2 then they should have donated part of their countries. We now have to figure out how to deal with this!
All this plus We will also be contending with China, Russia, and who knows who else? As we all know, the average Iraqi is far worse off and it will get a lot worse as this progress's. Likewise, as you know the average American is far worse off because of Bush. That too will get worse because he is not done completing his new societal order either.
This is all still getting started and Bush is an idiot to declare we are winning anything! We will be okay but we have to face reality and realize that we will win this but average citizens of the world are going to have to take an active role and I mean all around the world and I do not see that happening and it will have to if this is to be stopped. As such I see this only getting much worse and being on a much larger scale until citizens of the world come together to save themselves. Yes, I am afraid it is that bad! We are all being placated and we are powerless as our lives are being drastically altered.

James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com

10 comments:

Holly said...

Hey Patriot I have been reading your blogs but haven't made any comments because there is a lot I don't understand especially the stuff about Iran and Bush is wanting to attack them

Larry said...

Here is more of the problems in why we are in an never ending war:

As General Petraeus and Mr. Crocker were being questioned this afternoon, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic majority leader, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were conferring with Mr. Bush at the White House.

“It sounds to me as if General Petraeus is presenting a plan for at least a 10-year high-level U.S. presence in Iraq,” Ms. Pelosi said, described the White House session as “interesting.”

But Mr. Reid’s words and body language hinted that the meeting had included anger as well. “This war is the president’s war, and the Republicans have bought this war hook, line and sinker,” Mr. Reid said, expressing confidence in solid Democratic opposition to the war, as well as growing Republican dissent.

How sweet, hudling with Bush to further his war, while all others were at a hearing to end it.

Larry said...

Here is another reason the public appears nimble:

Proof of a conservative press:

Though papers may be "willing to consider" progressive syndicated columnists, this unprecedented study reveals the true extent of the dominance of conservatives:

Sixty percent of the nation's daily newspapers print more conservative syndicated columnists every week than progressive syndicated columnists. Only 20 percent run more progressives than conservatives, while the remaining 20 percent are evenly balanced.
In a given week, nationally syndicated progressive columnists are published in newspapers with a combined total circulation of 125 million. Conservative columnists, on the other hand, are published in newspapers with a combined total circulation of more than 152 million.2
The top 10 columnists as ranked by the number of papers in which they are carried include five conservatives, two centrists, and only three progressives.
The top 10 columnists as ranked by the total circulation of the papers in which they are published also include five conservatives, two centrists, and only three progressives.
In 38 states, the conservative voice is greater than the progressive voice -- in other words, conservative columns reach more readers in total than progressive columns. In only 12 states is the progressive voice greater than the conservative voice.
In three out of the four broad regions of the country -- the West, the South, and the Midwest -- conservative syndicated columnists reach more readers than progressive syndicated columnists. Only in the Northeast do progressives reach more readers, and only by a margin of 2 percent.
In eight of the nine divisions into which the U.S. Census Bureau divides the country, conservative syndicated columnists reach more readers than progressive syndicated columnists in any given week. Only in the Middle Atlantic division do progressive columnists reach more readers each week.
Though they have suffered slow but steady declines in readership over the last couple of decades, newspapers remain in many ways the most important of all news media. The Newspaper Association of America estimates that each copy of a weekday paper is read by an average of 2.1 adults, while each Sunday paper is read by an average of 2.5 adults,3 pushing total newspaper readership for daily papers to more than 116 million and Sunday papers to more than 134 million. This means that some columnists reach tens of millions of readers, and one, conservative George Will, actually reaches more than 50 million.

Furthermore, newspapers are the preferred news medium of those most interested in the news. According to a 2006 Pew Research Center study, 66 percent of those who say they follow political news closely regularly read newspapers, far more than the number who cite any other medium.4 And an almost identical proportion of those who say they "enjoy keeping up with the news" -- more than half the population -- turn to newspapers more than any other medium. These more aware citizens are in turn more likely to influence the opinions of their families, friends, and associates.

Syndicated newspaper columnists have a unique ability to influence public opinion and the national debate. And whether examining only the top columnists or the entire group, large papers or small, the data presented in this report make clear that conservative syndicated columnists enjoy a clear advantage over their progressive counterparts.

jmsjoin said...

Hey Holly
Glad to hear from you. Yes, Bush is blocking them in and will soon attack them. He is almost done setting up to attack them.
Attacking them is only one of his original goals in getting our military back in the middle east. He will not leave until he furthers his new middle east order as you can see.

Larry said...

Jim:

Check out this article claiming there is no North American Union.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/amero.asp

jmsjoin said...

Larry
I hate to disappoint Reid and Pelosi but 10 years would be short. Many life times is more like it. As we are drawing down in Korea Bush of course wants to set up camp in Iraq's civil war so he can contain Iran and further his new middle east order.
You know, that facade the last couple of days did just what Bush wanted. He use to listen to Congress but now that their is a Dem Congress and he has his betrayus he will listen to his Generals.
Anyway now the chief idiot says he cares what both sides say and he will take all opinions into account before he declares his action.
That of course means he will listen to them before he ignores them and does what he wants!

Larry said...

Jim:

Check out this link I got from Betmo on the most corrupt members of Congress, only one Democrat.

Beyond Delay

jmsjoin said...

Larry
I love to see proof that our system in this case the Media, is being swayed for a Political agenda. We all know it anyway but I would like to see it matter. The Media too is in Bush's pocket but like everything else we are powerless to do anything about it.

jmsjoin said...

Larry
You know I am interested in everything that affects our America and will not stop searching for the truth and getting itout. I just want to say I appreciate you sending me links and giving me a heads up. I have been tied up a bit with my arm and increasing corespodence with naj and others.
Anyway, you know I am convinced in the efforts for a NAU and have to wonder after your last comment if this is from a conservative to get us off point? I just do not trust those underhanded Right wingers.

jmsjoin said...

Larry
That list from Betmo is very interesting. I firmly believe that all corrupt Politicians should be canned. I don't care what party they are from. It is sick that something like this can be published and no repercussions to the underhanded slimes on it.
I didn't see this yesterday. I commented on Betmo's post yesterday and I didn't see this. When did she? post this?