Thursday, September 09, 2010

Russia is in the hot seat and the drivers seat in Iran, it's up to them which one they take






Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday that Iran needs to answer the demands of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) over its nuclear program. Iran needs to heed IAEA demands- Russia foreign min Save your breath unless you are going to take this seriously. Russia is loading Bushehr with uranium as you know. They can put themselves in the hot seat or insist on the IAEA inspectors or else. Iran will only listen if you slit their throat. Slitting their throat would be stopping the loading of uranium.

There is no way in hell Iran has a right to pick biased inspectors. Iran Claims Right to Pick UN Inspectors


We gave Iran their start in the fifties and once Khomenei returned from exile their efforts to control the middle east and develop nuclear power and weapons began in earnest. As you know, when asked by a journalist how he felt upon returning to Iran in 1979 after 15 years in exile. Khomeini’s curt, one-word reply was “nothing” Whoa! From day one of his return to Iran Khomeini expressed no love for Iran only a love of the atom bomb. The drive even then was to possess a nuclear weapon though that desire is still denied until Iran can get their hands on one.

I have tried to give Iran the benefit of the doubt when they say their nuclear desires are peaceful knowing they could use nuclear power as an energy source for their growing population. I have always asserted that perceived need could be cover for the real goal of developing a nuclear weapon.

The nuclear program of Iran was launched in the 1950s with the help of the United States as part of the Atoms for Peace program. The support, encouragement and participation of the United States and Western European governments in Iran's nuclear program continued until the 1979 Islamic revolution that toppled the Shah of Iran. We are so concerned about Pakistan and Iran today in regard to nuclear abilities and nuclear weapons and security. I was blown away to find out that we built the first nuclear Reactors in both Iran and Pakistan. Nuclear program of Iran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia atoms for peace

I would have to assume this was after we overthrew the democratically elected President of Iran Mohammad Mosaddeq to install our ruthless puppet the Shah of Iran. We built and supplied Iran's first reactor because we thought we were in control. What the hell is wrong with us? That makes us personally responsible for the 1979 Revolution in Iran, the capture of our hostages, the disaster in the desert after a failed attempt to rescue them, the rise of the Revolutionary Guard, the protesters dilemma, the nuclear issue in Iran today, everything!


You know from numerous discussions here that Iran is involved in every Middle Eastern country not just Yemen, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia where they have corrupted elections for Shiite interests in Iraq, backing rebels in Yemen, and instigating attacks on Saudi oil fields. Bush freed Iran to instigate far and wide and are even training Taliban on their border. Any new actions will only serve to worsen their instigation and cause them to cause chaos everywhere they can and further Bush's total Middle East breakdown Period.

You know, I have long said that Iran’s civilian nuclear program is a cover for their nuclear weapons program. They have been working at this for over 60 years nobody can seriously think anything can stop them without direct confrontation after they have gone this far. That would mean war whether it's Russia, the US or China. All we can hope for is that it is kept limited and not allowed to develop into WW3.


James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
http://anaverageamericanpatriot.blogspot.com

4 comments:

Demeur said...

The middle east has always wanted some type of major weapon be it chemical, biological, or nuclear. They look at it as a game of "who can run up and touch the grizzly bear".

Off topic but related to your post on legalizing pot. I see Mexico is considering legalizing it after a 3rd Mexican mayor was assassinated. I was going to post on this but trying to remember if Vicente Fox had been accused of ties to the cartels at one time. He's all for legalizing it now.

an average patriot said...

Yeah I can't believe we have since Bush been adding fuel to the fire by giving them advanced weapons breaking our long standing tradition.

No tie accusations. I have been busy taking care of a sick wife and other things or I might have done something myself about those 3 Mayors.

I found this: Fox, whose successor Felipe Calderon is mired in a bloody military campaign against powerful drug cartels, criticized the government's anti-drugs strategy on his blog, joining the ranks of other Latin American leaders who say the war on drugs is fundamentally flawed.

"Legalization does not mean that drugs are good ... but we have to see (legalization of the production, sale and distribution of drugs) as a strategy to weaken and break the economic system that allows cartels to earn huge profits," Fox wrote in a posting over the weekend.

That might help but they have to do something about the other drugs. Sell them to the Government for the same price they get on the market then destroy them!

Lisa Allender said...

Average Patriot--James, I must say, yhe "thatmeans weare responsible...", re. the hostage-taking(by us installing nuclear...) is astounding.
Im SHARE-ing your insights, on Facebook. :)

an average patriot said...

Hi Lisa glad I saw this! I am quickly taking care of things because I have to run to the VA. I saw your E and will get to it so bear with me sweetheart. Take care for now!