Anti Bolton from The get go how do we feel now? people are all of a sudden Important to Bush? No!

Personally I was very anti John Bolton from the outset. He was overly confrontational had too much baggage and was merely a tool for bush to impress his demands upon the UN in order to prosecute his idea of a new world order using the UN. John Bolton was nominated by President George W. Bush to his current position on March 7, 2005. His nomination was the subject of a prolonged filibuster in the United States Senate by Democrats and George Voinovich of Ohio, a Republican. I most certainly agreed with this!

I know it has been done in the past by both parties but I was very upset when On August 1, 2005, President Bush installed Bolton as Ambassador to the UN via recess appointment. I was peeved that once again Bush used underhanded backdoor politics to get his way.
Thinking he would be able to use these Rove's taught policies to keep control over Congress, this is just one more appointment that he thought would go his way and be permanent. The appointment though will last until a new Congress convenes in January 2007, or until Bolton is renominated and confirmed, whichever comes first. http://en.wikipedia.org/...

There are Caveats of course which we will discuss but I still think he is too antagonistic and confrontational as he recently exhibited with N Korea but I am beginning to think he is right for the job. I am sure you have your thoughts and can educate me. Please do but be kind.
However Now that Bush has to deal with a Democratic Senate he all of a sudden is stressing cooperation and bipartisanship as usual as long as it goes his way period. but... This is probably not what President Bush had in mind when he stressed bipartisanship after the Democratic Party's midterm elections sweep. A key Senate Republican has joined Democrats in opposing one of Bush's initiatives for the lame-duck Congress: John Bolton's nomination as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

Of course with a Democratic Congress taking control in January Bush wants Bolton's nomination voted on before years end along with much more. But Republican Sen. Lincoln Chafee, who was defeated in this week's election, said he would block Bolton's nomination. Chafee, a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters that he did not believe Bolton's nomination would move forward without his support.

I am vehemently against Bush's agenda and plan for new world order and knowing now that Bush will do as he wants at any cost. Anyway, now that I have heard that Bush can reappoint Bolton but he must serve without pay, I have to say that would somehow be facilitated in order to follow their plans at any cost.

I just want to say this in closing! All of a sudden Bush wants to put the elections behind us and on a bipartisan basis start doing what is right for America and the People. I have to agree with Senator Durbin when he said: For a Republican Congress to have gone forward for two years and produced so little, and then for the president to come up with a huge agenda for the next two weeks, you have to ask him, 'Why didn't you use some of the time you spent arguing on some less important issues before?' Please check out the story at the link. I just don't know what to say any more about this unscrupulous Bush!http://www.cnn.com/...

James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com