With tensions rapidly increasing is it time for Obama to reach out to Russia and say the war mongering will end if he's elected! US and Russia unite!

Two days ago I illustrated that from day one with Bush absolutely everything that has happened in America and around the world with Al Qaeda and the so called terrorists has been created to prepare for and instigate the world to war. Russia proved they know it and it is working! today it gets even more tenuous and closer.

I illustrated this by pointing out that Russian President Vladimir Putin complained Friday about "one-way" Western military demands and promised that Russia will respond to U.S. and NATO military expansion near its borders. "We have been put in a situation where we have to react," Putin said of U.S. plans to deploy a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic and build new bases in Romania and Bulgaria. "They tried to convince us that all these activities aren't against Russia, but our concerns have gone unanswered," Putin said. "Unfortunately our partners use a diplomatic and informational cover to hide their real plans." "We have been put in a situation where we have to react. We have been forced to make certain decisions. Russia will always respond to this new challenge," Putin said.

Putin said he sees a "new turn in the arms race" in which "well-developed countries" invest more to produce better weapons than those in Russia. Putin promised that balance would soon shift. "In the near future, we will develop new weapons that have the same characteristics, and in some cases better characteristics, as those being built by other countries," he said. Russia will counter Bush

At the Munich Conference on Security Policy where Afghanistan was a central topic A central theme of Gates' speech was his assertion that al-Qaida extremists, either in Afghanistan or elsewhere, pose a greater threat to Europe than many Europeans realize. After delivering his prepared remarks Gates fielded questions from his audience, which included dozens of top government officials, mainly from Europe and the United States, as well as military officers, private security specialists, members of Congress and European parliamentarians.

** A member of the Russian parliament, leading off the questioning, accused the United States of having created today's al-Qaida threat through its support in the 1980s for the mujahadeen resistance to Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Bingo! Also addressing the conference was Sergei Ivanov, the former Russian defense minister who is now a deputy prime minister. He advocated joining forces to fight international terrorism, but suggested the United States has motives that are out of step with those of Russia and other countries. "Some states strive to exploit anti-terrorist activities as a pretext to achieving their own geopolitical and economic goals," Ivanov said, apparently referring to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. Bingo, Bingo, Bingo! Gates lied but Russia was right accusing Bush of using terrorism to achieve a hidden agenda

My question was why the hell can Americans not realize this has been a set up from the very beginning so the people behind Bush can achieve their idea of new world order? I included a step by step illustration!

The step by step set up and preparation for World War Three:

* The election of Bush to cheerlead the the new world (dis)order agenda through

* The creation of Al Qaeda as the threat to our existence and the allowance of 9/11 to mask Bush's real agenda

* Implementation of the Patriot Act 1&2 giving Bush the power he needed to begin implementing his new world (dis)order

* The lying attack on Iraq to get into the middle east and get this world changing war going

* The constant instigation of Iran as that will be the impetus for World War Three

* The division of middle east countries so they can be divided and conquered as has been done with us

* The missile defense system on Russia's door step to instigate them to fight and they are preparing

* The engineered housing and financial crisis in America beginning the Second Great Depression, WW2 ended the first one!

* The resultant financial disaster that is still developing here and around the world (making war more palatable)

* The selective loss of communications in the middle east last week that crippled some and left Israel and Iraq unaffected

* These steps are not in order and as you know there are numerous others but the recent loss of communication and the internet in the middle east told me the set up is complete and Bush feels he can own space thus the outcome of the war through HAARP

** I often say All that remains is for Bush to find the excuse to attack Iran and get this going. I am afraid that Bush has set the agenda for the US regardless of who gets elected as our next President. Whoever it is will be forced to fight the future wars Bush has set the stage for! The only benefit of having a Democratic President will be to the lives of the elderly and average Americans!

Well now it is getting rapidly worse but I do believe Obama can and should put an end to all this! First I found out today that American fighter jets intercepted two Russian bombers, one of which buzzed a U.S. aircraft carrier in the western Pacific on Saturday, U.S. military officials told CNN Monday. One of them twice flew about 2,000 feet over the deck of the USS Nimitz Saturday while another flew about 50 miles away, officials said. Two others were at least 100 miles away, the military reported. U.S. defense officials said four F/A-18A fighter jets from the Nimitz were in the air. Russian bombers buzz the Nimitz

*** Of course Russia doesn't see a problem or understand the hoopla but in the race towards world war three I do. However I now believe this can all be avoided. If in steps Barack Obama. It will benefit him in getting the nomination and ultimate election as our President and will release tensions, anxieties, and the otherwise promise of World War Three. Sen. Barack Obama heads into the so-called Potomac primaries looking to sustain the momentum he mustered in his sweep of five Democratic contests last weekend. The demographics in Tuesday's primaries suggest the senator from Illinois could pull off a political hat trick over rival Sen. Hillary Clinton.

Victories in Maryland, Virginia and the District would give Barack Obama a narrow but undisputed lead among pledged delegates to the Democratic National Convention. Together with the rest of his recent string of victories, such a sweep would bestow unmistakable momentum heading toward next week's primary in Wisconsin and caucus in Hawaii. That kind of success normally would be enough to crown someone a front-runner, but in this case, it would make Obama, as Democratic pollster Mark Mellman put it, a front-runner by inches in a tied race. In this race at least, as Democratic strategist Don Fowler noted, front-runner does not mean winner. 8 questions the Potomac Primary can answer

Barak should sweep because people are catching on that he is our answer! I firmly believe that he should reach out to Russia and let them know the war mongering will end after he is elected and that Russia and the US should unite to secure the future of the world and their would be no need or tolerance of anymore weapons improvements or proliferation. That would give Barack the nomination and win him the election. It is the only way I can think of to put a halt to the race to an earth shattering nuclear World War Three. Please tell me what you think and please pass the idea around!

James Joiner

Gardner Ma

http://www.anaveragepatriot.com/

The Battle for the direction of America's future is rapidly shaping up! Division and war mongering vs. Unity and peace!

The Choice of America's future is War or Peace this fall!

This morning I woke to hear that Giuliani was dropping out of the race of the war mongering party and was backing McCain! After yesterdays developments with the Kennedy trio throwing their significant weight behind Obama giving him the backing of experience respected in much of the country and hearing that Giuliani was dropping out to back the war monger McCain I was going to discuss the rapidly developing sides in the direction America is to hopefully take into the future if we have a choice any more thanks to Bush who has set the world into action against us regardless of who gets elected if we even have elections. Very convoluted and complicated at best! now I just heard that Edwards has also dropped out and has not yet announced or said who he would back. I am hoping he backs Obama and that their is an Obama Edwards ticket The battle for the direction of America's direction in the future is rapidly taking shape and we must get involved on the side of Peace and Unity!

Things are moving rapidly! Last night we hear Sen. John McCain's Florida win essentially turns the GOP presidential race into a two-man contest between the Arizonan and Mitt Romney as the campaigns geared up Wednesday for next week's Super Tuesday races. war or Religion hmm! Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani placed a distant third with 15 percent of the vote, followed closely by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who held 14 percent. The win gives McCain all 57 Florida delegates at stake. The victory also is significant because it proves McCain can win a contest solely involving Republicans. Florida is a closed primary, so no crossover voting among Republicans and Democrats is allowed. McCain's primary wins in New Hampshire and South Carolina were due in part to the backing of independents who cast ballots in the GOP contests. However, McCain still finished second to Romney and Huckabee with conservatives and evangelicals, two key wings of the Republican Party. The battle continues between war mongering and Religion with Repugs

This caught me off guard though! Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards will drop out of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination on Wednesday, a day after his dismal showing in the Florida Democratic primary. The Southern candidate, who has run a populist campaign, is scheduled to make the announcement at a 1 p.m. news conference in New Orleans, La., where he began his populist campaign, aides said. New York Sen. Hillary Clinton trounced Edwards and Illinois Sen. Barack Obama Tuesday, although the victory does not bring with it any delegates. The Democratic National Committee stripped Florida of its delegates for moving its primary to an early date.

Edwards failed to beat either Obama or Clinton in any of the 2008 presidential races, losing in New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada and South Carolina. In Florida, Clinton garnered 50 percent of the vote, while Obama racked up 33 percent and Edwards mustered only 14 percent. as we know, Arizona Sen. John McCain won Florida's Republican contest, capturing the state's 57 delegates in the winner-take-all contest. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is expected to drop out of the race and throw his support to McCain, as the Arizona senator's campaign builds momentum going into next week's Super Tuesday contests. Despite his loss, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney told supporters he will stay in the race, saying America needs someone who has had a job in the real economy. Giuliani finished a distant third and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee finished fourth. Edwards drops out

* The battle for America's future is shaping up! Unity vs. war on the lift. War mongering vs. perverted Religion on the right. Today's revelation about Bush's intentions for the future make it more critical that the Republicans fight amongst themselves, Edwards backs Obama defeating Billary, and Obama gets elected and survives to chart the future of America!

Four months after announcing troop reductions in Iraq, President Bush is now sending signals that the cuts may not continue past this summer, a development likely to infuriate Democrats and renew concerns among military planners about strains on the force. Mr. Bush has made no decisions on troop reductions to follow those he announced last September. But White House officials said Mr. Bush had been taking the opportunity, as he did in Monday’s State of the Union address, to prepare Americans for the possibility that, when he leaves office a year from now, the military presence in Iraq will be just as large as it was a year ago, or even slightly larger. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Mr. Bush wanted to tamp down criticism that a large, sustained presence in Iraq would harm the overall health of the military — a view held not only by Democrats, but by some members of his own Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Within the Pentagon, senior officers have struggled to balance the demands of the Iraq war against the competing demands to recruit, train and retain a robust and growing ground force. That institutional tension is personified by two of Mr. Bush’s top generals, David H. Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, and George W. Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff. General Petraeus’s mission is to win the war; General Casey must also worry about the health of the whole Army. “We’re concerned about the health of the force as well, but the most important thing is that they succeed in Iraq,” said one senior White House official, adding, “If the commanders on the ground believe we need to maintain the troop numbers at the current level to maintain security for a little while longer, then that’s what the president will do.” That strong White House tilt in favor of General Petraeus comes as he prepares to testify before Congress in April about the next step in Iraq. In September, based on General Petraeus’s earlier recommendation, Mr. Bush announced that he intended to withdraw five combat brigades and Marine units — roughly 20,000 troops — from Iraq by July. That would leave 15 combat brigades in place.

In his address to Congress, Mr. Bush spoke of those reductions, but not of any future ones. What a continuing commitment of 15 brigades — more than 130,000 troops — would mean for the Army as a whole is said to be a major concern of General Casey, among others on the joint staff. But officials said Mr. Bush’s primary concern was not letting military gains in Iraq slip away, a warning he issued in his State of the Union address. Mr. Bush hinted in September that there might be more reductions to come, although he has never made an explicit promise. The Pentagon has also not made any promises, although military planners have talked about wanting to reduce the number of brigades to 12 from 15 by the end of this year, if the security situation improves enough to permit it. Mr. Bush’s defense secretary Robert M. Gates has said he would like to cut even further, eventually dropping to 10 brigades if possible. But Mr. Gates has avoided using specific numbers in more recent comments, and says unswervingly that he would be guided by conditions on the ground. At the Pentagon, officials said the withdrawal of 20,000 combat troops pledged by Mr. Bush left open the future of the 7,000 to 8,000 support and aviation troops that accompanied those “surge” combat forces. If those extra support troops remain in Iraq even after the withdrawal of the additional combat troops, then it is possible that the number of American military personnel in Iraq after the surge could be higher than before, officials said. Bush sending signals of no troop reduction in Iraq

** The future is quite clear if left up to Bush and his war mongering prognosticators! Edwards administers progressive ideas and has said in the past that as long as he was alive and breathing the voice of his supporters would be heard in this campaign. I believe the man and that means he will be actively supporting and backing Obama or Hillary. I believe absolutely that it will be Obama as he is the person that will most likely unite America and bring back support to average Americans. Anything else would be a vote for a future of war mongering not healing and if we are lucky, peace!

James Joiner
Gardner Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com