Being totally unbiased you have to ask yourself this question and a lot more. We know Bush Proposes to give a tax break as incentive. He says he want large corperations to have an incentive to come in and rebuild Katrina revaged areas. Isn't the prospect of making hundreds of millions enough incentive? Isn't Bush's lowering of the minimum wage minimum enabling companies to pay lower wages and make even larger profits, incentive? Halliburton alone has proven in the past that their only incentive is to take advantage of a bad situation and Government contracts. I know I am not an expert except in living in the trenches of american society. However where is the incentive for the poor to go back into storm ravaged areas? W e have heard since evacuations started that many are better off in their adoptive states. Many have new and better opportunities elsewhere. Why does Bush not propose giving them a tax incentive? Not just a low income home loan etc. that they will get in their adopted location anyway. I know he is a friend of big business as we all do. We hear of his spending more Federal Dollars on the poor than any President before him. This is probably necessarily true. Under Him the rich are getting filthy rich and the poor are increasing exponentialy. The Government is big on studies. Why not do a study comparing the Bush benefits to the rich in contrast to those given to the poor. That would certainly prove interesting.
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment