Now, I have to tell you, things are really ratcheting up to the upcoming conflict with Iran. I was curious this morning when I heard on the radio that Iran appears to be cooperating now because they and the Brits are now talking and Iran announced they for now will not televise any more statements by the captured Brits because the Brits are cooperating.
I for one haven't heard a change of stance have any of you? Anyway that only helps Iran in dealing with the Brits but as far as Iranian citizens and the rest of the middle east proves, those captured Brit's legal or not have already served their purpose as proven by the Government sanctioned protests at the Brit Embassy in Iran and recent announcements by Saudi Prince Bandar. those supposed confessions by the marines real or coerced as the Brit's insist does not matter. The Iranian's and countries in the middle easr believe it and that's all that matters.
Anyway This mornings event was a missing American in Iran. It is too coincidental to have nothing to do with recent events as we are being told in light of the timing and that the man was ex FBI supposedly
on private business. http://www.cnn.com/...
That said, this morning I was sent additionally interesting articles about Russia and the middle east. I do remember about a week ago receiving an article that Russia thought the U.S. attack on Iran could come on the 8th of April (Easter Sunday). Now this one saying it could happen on the 6th of April.
The United States will be ready to launch a missile attack on Iran's nuclear facilities as soon as early this month, perhaps "from 4 a.m. until 4 p.m. on April 6," according to reports in the Russian media on Saturday.
According to Russian intelligence sources, the reports said, the US has devised a plan to attack several targets in Iran, and an assault could be carried out by launching missiles from fighter jets and warships stationed in the Persian Gulf.
Russian news agency RIA Novosti quoted a security official as saying, "Russian intelligence has information that the US Armed Forces stationed in the Persian Gulf have nearly completed preparations for a missile strike against Iranian territory." Coupled with other information I received this morning that the 2 Brits killed in the supposed arctic Sub accident. A Moscow newspaper reports that The British Department of Defense admitted that two sailors killed and one seriously wounded in the atomic submarine Tireless were taking part in secret maneuvers under Arctic waters, the newspaper Military Industry Herald reported here.
If that accident had not happened, public opinion would have never known that the British and US navies were carrying out military maneuvers under the polar caps, added the publication. Like in the tensest times of the Cold War, troops from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are trying to take control of the Arctic route, said the newspaper. Just what does this mean? http://www.plenglish.com/...
Anyway to me this all points to the fact that what we already know and that is that a war with Iran will happen we just cannot pin down the day and we will not be able to. Plus I am hearing the rumor that the Head of military intelligence says Iran, Syria and Hizbullah are preparing for possible confrontation with US this summer. http://www.ynetnews.com/...
With Russia openly throwing out attack dates amongst others and all else that is happening at the same time, this attack will happen due to multiple provocation's but you can bet If someone has hit the date Bush will change it. He merely has to make his move before Congress can get in his way and he will.
I remember over a year ago doing a story saying that Iran was ready to act and had thousands of sleepers in the U.S. and around the world prepared to activate and attack sensitive areas and hit the U.S. in many spots with prepared suicide bombers. Whether or not that is true who knows. To me the thing that really kills me is that Bush can care less and will attack period. He will only use any activity by Iran in his favor to further his plans for war and new order to say see I told you, even though in large part it is all instigated by him.
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
Showing posts with label captured British marines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label captured British marines. Show all posts
Monday, April 02, 2007
Friday, March 30, 2007
Iran: Britain Attacked their Embassy in Basra, Just latest attempt to get Britain to Alienate the U.S. in Iraq!
Iran saying Britain attacked their Embassy in Basra just latest attempt to get Britain to Alienate the U.S. in Iraq, It all makes sense now!
Knowing that over a year ago Iran was demanding that Britain get out of Basra. http://www.boston.com/...
An awful lot in regards to recent events just made instant sense to me and it is not good for Britain the U.S. or for Iran knowing the west will not bow to this but will eventually react!
Anyway, we have been hearing numerous conflicting stories as to who is trying to snow who in regard to the 15 captured British marines. I happen to believe that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are the instigators but I couldn't figure out why! After hearing these conflicting reports in regard to Iran's Embassy in Basra it all started making sense and why go after the British!
I was first sent this report from someone who believes Britain and the U.S. are monsters. and didn't believe it but didn't understand what was going on. British forces were surrounding the Iranian consulate in Basra, Al Arabiya reported on Thursday, according to an Israel Radio citation. The forces were trying to exert pressure on Iran to release the 15 British soldiers being held captive. http://www.jpost.com/...
Maybe I am biased and I do believe Blaire has made a mistake blindly following Bush but I refused to believe they were this stupid. The following report made the truth clear to me.
At a critical period in the crisis over Iran's seizure of 15 British sailors and marines, the Iranian consul in Basra charged that British soldiers on Thursday had surrounded his office in the southern city and fired shots into the air. Britain denied the allegation.
The Ministry of Defense in London said the shooting was an exchange of gunfire after British troops on a foot patrol near the Iranian consulate were ambushed. But Iranian Consul-General Mohammed Ridha Nasir Baghban said British forces had engaged in a "provocative act" that "could worsen the situation of the British sailors."
"British forces should rely on wisdom and not react because of the British forces' detention. This reflects negatively on bilateral relations," Baghban told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. Baghban claimed British forces surrounded the consulate about 10:00 a.m. and fired randomly into the air. http://www.iht.com/...
It dawned on me after watching the exchange between Britain and Iran over the last week that the ultimate goal here is to keep those British troops in the hopes of getting Britain to alienate the U.S. and leave Iraq thereby leaving the U.S. to fight the mess in Iraq on its own but you know it will fail.
I understand there are many that say Iran does not want to fight the West but I firmly believe the Revolutionary Guard does and they are the ones behind the recent events in the Gulf.
There will be no deal here and neither side will relent. Nor do I think Britain should because it would only embolden Iran. This will only serve to get this war with Iran going!
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
Knowing that over a year ago Iran was demanding that Britain get out of Basra. http://www.boston.com/...
An awful lot in regards to recent events just made instant sense to me and it is not good for Britain the U.S. or for Iran knowing the west will not bow to this but will eventually react!
Anyway, we have been hearing numerous conflicting stories as to who is trying to snow who in regard to the 15 captured British marines. I happen to believe that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are the instigators but I couldn't figure out why! After hearing these conflicting reports in regard to Iran's Embassy in Basra it all started making sense and why go after the British!
I was first sent this report from someone who believes Britain and the U.S. are monsters. and didn't believe it but didn't understand what was going on. British forces were surrounding the Iranian consulate in Basra, Al Arabiya reported on Thursday, according to an Israel Radio citation. The forces were trying to exert pressure on Iran to release the 15 British soldiers being held captive. http://www.jpost.com/...
Maybe I am biased and I do believe Blaire has made a mistake blindly following Bush but I refused to believe they were this stupid. The following report made the truth clear to me.
At a critical period in the crisis over Iran's seizure of 15 British sailors and marines, the Iranian consul in Basra charged that British soldiers on Thursday had surrounded his office in the southern city and fired shots into the air. Britain denied the allegation.
The Ministry of Defense in London said the shooting was an exchange of gunfire after British troops on a foot patrol near the Iranian consulate were ambushed. But Iranian Consul-General Mohammed Ridha Nasir Baghban said British forces had engaged in a "provocative act" that "could worsen the situation of the British sailors."
"British forces should rely on wisdom and not react because of the British forces' detention. This reflects negatively on bilateral relations," Baghban told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. Baghban claimed British forces surrounded the consulate about 10:00 a.m. and fired randomly into the air. http://www.iht.com/...
It dawned on me after watching the exchange between Britain and Iran over the last week that the ultimate goal here is to keep those British troops in the hopes of getting Britain to alienate the U.S. and leave Iraq thereby leaving the U.S. to fight the mess in Iraq on its own but you know it will fail.
I understand there are many that say Iran does not want to fight the West but I firmly believe the Revolutionary Guard does and they are the ones behind the recent events in the Gulf.
There will be no deal here and neither side will relent. Nor do I think Britain should because it would only embolden Iran. This will only serve to get this war with Iran going!
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
British Marines still incommunicado in Iran, Blair promises a different phase as U.S. shows force in Gulf!
British Marines still incommunicado in Iran, Blair promises a different phase as U.S. shows massive force in Gulf! Does that help?
Looking at the recent confrontations with Iran on Iraq's land and water border with Iran and evaluating both instances I have come to the conclusion that Iran's Revolutionary Guard whose business it is to protect and defend The Islamic Revolution is instigating conflict with Britain and the U.S. http://www.dailykos.com/...
I understand that the captured Marine's will now be allowed contact with Embassy Officials but their location is not yet known and nothing has been resolved yet. I also understand that Tony Blair has vowed that Britain is prepared to move to a "different phase" if negotiations fail to free those held captive.
Asked what that meant, Blair said: "Well, we will just have to see, but what they should understand is that we cannot have a situation where our servicemen and women are seized when actually they are in Iraqi waters under a U.N. mandate, patrolling perfectly rightly and in accordance with that mandate, and then effectively captured and taken to Iran." British authorities we are told are confident that they have evidence to prove their insistence that the Royal Navy personnel never left Iraqi waters," and His office did say though that officials may have to make public evidence proving the Britons were seized in Iraqi -- not Iranian -- waters, if there is no swift release of the sailors. http://www.cnn.com/...
I just don't get it! If the Brits have evidence that proves the British were captured while in Iraqi or international waters then why are they not putting it out in the public? they say they want to resolve this quickly but seem to be allowing it to drag on. It is no coincidence that this has now gone on for four days and meanwhile the U.S. is putting a massive show of maritime and air force in the Gulf. The U.S. Navy on Tuesday began its largest demonstration of force in the Gulf since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, deploying two aircraft carriers and conducting simulated aerial attacks.
The maneuvers, involving 15 U.S. warships and more than a hundred planes, were certain to increase tension with Iran, which has frequently condemned the U.S. military presence off its coastline. According to navy Lieutenant John Perkins these maneuvers are only to demonstrate our flexibility and our capability to respond to threats to Maritime security and that we can keep the maritime environment safe and the vital link to the global economy open.
This supposedly was planned before the Revolutionary Guard incident but the Lieutenant declined to say when. So what does that tell you? We now have 2 carrier strike groups in the Gulf. Each carrier hosts an air wing of F/A-18 Hornet and Superhornet fighter-bombers, EA-6B Prowler electronic warfare aircraft, S-3 Viking antisubmarine and refuelers, and E-2C Hawkeye airborne command-and-control craft.
Also taking part were guided-missile destroyers USS Anzio, USS Ramage, USS O'Kane, USS Mason, USS Preble and USS Nitze; and minesweepers USS Scout, USS Gladiator and USS Ardent. Plus A French naval strike group, led by the aircraft carrier Charles DE Gaulle, was operating simultaneously just outside the Gulf but not participating in the exercise. http://www.cnn.com/...
With all this sea and air power concentrated in one small area it is just the perfect recipe for confrontation. No wonder we are beginning to collide. What else could be the expected outcome? Whose cause does this U.S. Naval exercise serve anyway, ours or Iran's? Both sides of this threatening conflict appear to be doing their damnedest to get this war going. There does not appear to be any way of stopping this desired war between Iran's Revolutionary Guard and Bush and his interests. Someone please tell me if I am wrong!
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
Looking at the recent confrontations with Iran on Iraq's land and water border with Iran and evaluating both instances I have come to the conclusion that Iran's Revolutionary Guard whose business it is to protect and defend The Islamic Revolution is instigating conflict with Britain and the U.S. http://www.dailykos.com/...
I understand that the captured Marine's will now be allowed contact with Embassy Officials but their location is not yet known and nothing has been resolved yet. I also understand that Tony Blair has vowed that Britain is prepared to move to a "different phase" if negotiations fail to free those held captive.
Asked what that meant, Blair said: "Well, we will just have to see, but what they should understand is that we cannot have a situation where our servicemen and women are seized when actually they are in Iraqi waters under a U.N. mandate, patrolling perfectly rightly and in accordance with that mandate, and then effectively captured and taken to Iran." British authorities we are told are confident that they have evidence to prove their insistence that the Royal Navy personnel never left Iraqi waters," and His office did say though that officials may have to make public evidence proving the Britons were seized in Iraqi -- not Iranian -- waters, if there is no swift release of the sailors. http://www.cnn.com/...
I just don't get it! If the Brits have evidence that proves the British were captured while in Iraqi or international waters then why are they not putting it out in the public? they say they want to resolve this quickly but seem to be allowing it to drag on. It is no coincidence that this has now gone on for four days and meanwhile the U.S. is putting a massive show of maritime and air force in the Gulf. The U.S. Navy on Tuesday began its largest demonstration of force in the Gulf since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, deploying two aircraft carriers and conducting simulated aerial attacks.
The maneuvers, involving 15 U.S. warships and more than a hundred planes, were certain to increase tension with Iran, which has frequently condemned the U.S. military presence off its coastline. According to navy Lieutenant John Perkins these maneuvers are only to demonstrate our flexibility and our capability to respond to threats to Maritime security and that we can keep the maritime environment safe and the vital link to the global economy open.
This supposedly was planned before the Revolutionary Guard incident but the Lieutenant declined to say when. So what does that tell you? We now have 2 carrier strike groups in the Gulf. Each carrier hosts an air wing of F/A-18 Hornet and Superhornet fighter-bombers, EA-6B Prowler electronic warfare aircraft, S-3 Viking antisubmarine and refuelers, and E-2C Hawkeye airborne command-and-control craft.
Also taking part were guided-missile destroyers USS Anzio, USS Ramage, USS O'Kane, USS Mason, USS Preble and USS Nitze; and minesweepers USS Scout, USS Gladiator and USS Ardent. Plus A French naval strike group, led by the aircraft carrier Charles DE Gaulle, was operating simultaneously just outside the Gulf but not participating in the exercise. http://www.cnn.com/...
With all this sea and air power concentrated in one small area it is just the perfect recipe for confrontation. No wonder we are beginning to collide. What else could be the expected outcome? Whose cause does this U.S. Naval exercise serve anyway, ours or Iran's? Both sides of this threatening conflict appear to be doing their damnedest to get this war going. There does not appear to be any way of stopping this desired war between Iran's Revolutionary Guard and Bush and his interests. Someone please tell me if I am wrong!
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
Saturday, March 24, 2007
When all is said and done the Revolutionary Guard, Israel, and Bush, will have their War!
Supposedly the captured British marines admit to a purposeful incursion into Iranian waters.this is a classic setup.
Iran says the 15 British sailors and marines seized by Iran in the Persian Gulf have confessed to trespassing into Iranian territory, the semi-official FARS News Agency reported Saturday.But the British Ministry of Defense would not confirm the report. (Watch reports on UK troops 'confessing' to being in Iran waters )
The British government said its request to communicate with the detained troops has not been granted by Iran.
The British Ministry of Defense said Friday the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy surrounded and seized the marines while they were conducting a routine inspection on a merchant vessel. They were then "escorted by Iranian vessels into Iranian territorial waters." (Location of incident)
Iran's foreign ministry spokesman on Saturday condemned the British government for attempting to cover up its "blunder" and said it should stop "putting blame on others," according to IRNA, the state-run Iranian news agency. http://www.cnn.com/...
When all is said and done the Revolutionary Guard, Israel, and Bush, will have their War! It looks after all like the Gulf will be the boiling point. I will be keeping an eye on the developments on this as they continue to unfold. Anyway, Bush, Britain, Israel, Iran, China, Russia, all of them are looking for this war and a chance to test their technology and military. They all feel they can militarily win their way and no body will like the results.
It does not seem strange to me at all that this confrontation in the Gulf took place. You have to remember a couple of things. Yesterday I referred to a naval confrontation between Iran and the U.S. in 1998 that was the largest naval battle since WW2 and with the U.S. Losing 1 ship and Iran 6, it was a lopsided victory Iran wants payback and they constantly say do not be fooled, we are much better then during Gulf 1. It also only makes sense that the Revolutionary guard would be in the forefront and not the regular military because as is the case with the U.S., it is the Religious zealots in Iran that are looking to assert their desires not the regular citizens. They will be dragged into this like the average American has been.
A professor from Columbia University said nothing ever comes of these confrontations.You do have to wonder why they pay them the big bucks. There are no experts today beyond those of us on the lower level of life "if you will" where this confrontation is coming from and will be instigated. You constantly hear idiots like Bush say this is a war like no other and we must think like never before as he and others prove incapable of doing. Anyway with that said, the Professor under normal conditions would be right! But these are not normal conditions.
Normally with naval confrontation as this, muscles would be flexed to say don't mess with us and a diplomatic solution would be worked out. It is way beyond that. No one wants a Diplomatic solution. Bush and Israel want their new middle east order and at the same time the so called Islamists want their version. no one wants a Diplomatic solution! It's funny but these so called experts have proven from the beginning of this so called war on terror that they are worthless today and do not have a clue! They have learned no lessons from Vietnam, Lebanon, Iraq, or any of the many interventions and conflicts of the past.
At any rate, Iran, or the revolutionary guard does want conflict. That is why they took the 15 British Marine's and when all is said and done they and Bush will get their way and we will all pay.
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
Iran says the 15 British sailors and marines seized by Iran in the Persian Gulf have confessed to trespassing into Iranian territory, the semi-official FARS News Agency reported Saturday.But the British Ministry of Defense would not confirm the report. (Watch reports on UK troops 'confessing' to being in Iran waters )
The British government said its request to communicate with the detained troops has not been granted by Iran.
The British Ministry of Defense said Friday the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy surrounded and seized the marines while they were conducting a routine inspection on a merchant vessel. They were then "escorted by Iranian vessels into Iranian territorial waters." (Location of incident)
Iran's foreign ministry spokesman on Saturday condemned the British government for attempting to cover up its "blunder" and said it should stop "putting blame on others," according to IRNA, the state-run Iranian news agency. http://www.cnn.com/...
When all is said and done the Revolutionary Guard, Israel, and Bush, will have their War! It looks after all like the Gulf will be the boiling point. I will be keeping an eye on the developments on this as they continue to unfold. Anyway, Bush, Britain, Israel, Iran, China, Russia, all of them are looking for this war and a chance to test their technology and military. They all feel they can militarily win their way and no body will like the results.
It does not seem strange to me at all that this confrontation in the Gulf took place. You have to remember a couple of things. Yesterday I referred to a naval confrontation between Iran and the U.S. in 1998 that was the largest naval battle since WW2 and with the U.S. Losing 1 ship and Iran 6, it was a lopsided victory Iran wants payback and they constantly say do not be fooled, we are much better then during Gulf 1. It also only makes sense that the Revolutionary guard would be in the forefront and not the regular military because as is the case with the U.S., it is the Religious zealots in Iran that are looking to assert their desires not the regular citizens. They will be dragged into this like the average American has been.
A professor from Columbia University said nothing ever comes of these confrontations.You do have to wonder why they pay them the big bucks. There are no experts today beyond those of us on the lower level of life "if you will" where this confrontation is coming from and will be instigated. You constantly hear idiots like Bush say this is a war like no other and we must think like never before as he and others prove incapable of doing. Anyway with that said, the Professor under normal conditions would be right! But these are not normal conditions.
Normally with naval confrontation as this, muscles would be flexed to say don't mess with us and a diplomatic solution would be worked out. It is way beyond that. No one wants a Diplomatic solution. Bush and Israel want their new middle east order and at the same time the so called Islamists want their version. no one wants a Diplomatic solution! It's funny but these so called experts have proven from the beginning of this so called war on terror that they are worthless today and do not have a clue! They have learned no lessons from Vietnam, Lebanon, Iraq, or any of the many interventions and conflicts of the past.
At any rate, Iran, or the revolutionary guard does want conflict. That is why they took the 15 British Marine's and when all is said and done they and Bush will get their way and we will all pay.
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
Friday, March 23, 2007
15 British Marines captured by Iran in the Gulf plus missing Iranian spy push's war with Iran closer!
15 British Marines Captured by Iran in the Gulf, plus missing Iranian spy bring the war with Iran ever closer!
I must admit I do not remember this but I just heard on CNN that Iran and the U.S. had the biggest Navy battle since WW2 in the same area in the Gulf in 1988. I do not have a link to that I just heard it on the news. In light of what has just occurred and was has occurred of late, some serious thought is called for.
An Iranian naval patrol seized 15 British sailors who had boarded a vessel suspected of smuggling cars of the coast of Iraq, military officials said. The Royal Marines and ordinary naval officers were believed to have been apprehended by up to six ships from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy who claimed they had entered Iranian waters. I understand this was not the regular Iranian navy but that it was the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, not that that should matter.
British naval officials said the sailors, using small boarding craft, had completed an inspection of a merchant vessel in Iraqi waters when the Iranians arrived. Commodore Nick Lambert, commander of the H.M.S. Cornwall -- the frigate from which the British patrol had been deployed -- said the incident did not involve fighting or use of weapons."We've been assured from the scant communications that we've had from the Iranians at the tactical level that the 15 people are safely in their hands," he said.
Of course the British are calling for the immediate return of men and equipment but there has been no Iranian response of yet. I would not expect there to be for a couple of days because Iran is in the middle of a Religious holiday. Anyway please check out the map to see where this is happening!
http://www.cnn.com/...
Anyway In light of the fact that A former Iranian spy chief was suspected of defecting to the West, raising the prospect of a timely intelligence bonanza amid tensions with Teheran.
While the speculation is impossible to verify, it is hard to imagine a more tantalizing prospect for Western intelligence agencies than the defection of General Ali Reza Azkari, who is known to have served in Lebanon in the 1990s liaising with Hizbollah. He would also be a wealth of information as to the depth of Iranian involvement in Iraq.
That could be the case but after almost 3 weeks I have heard no word as to the status of General Azkari but Iran is ratcheting up the rhetoric that the U.S. has kidnapped him. With the increasing tensions on the Iraq Iran Border, increased tensions in Iraq as to Iranian involvement there, with American Fighter and tanker aircraft in place in Europe and the fact that we have discussed in the past that the navy in the Gulf would be doing its share to find an excuse for Bush to attack Iran, you have to wonder who was really at fault here and where this is going to lead?
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
I must admit I do not remember this but I just heard on CNN that Iran and the U.S. had the biggest Navy battle since WW2 in the same area in the Gulf in 1988. I do not have a link to that I just heard it on the news. In light of what has just occurred and was has occurred of late, some serious thought is called for.
An Iranian naval patrol seized 15 British sailors who had boarded a vessel suspected of smuggling cars of the coast of Iraq, military officials said. The Royal Marines and ordinary naval officers were believed to have been apprehended by up to six ships from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy who claimed they had entered Iranian waters. I understand this was not the regular Iranian navy but that it was the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, not that that should matter.
British naval officials said the sailors, using small boarding craft, had completed an inspection of a merchant vessel in Iraqi waters when the Iranians arrived. Commodore Nick Lambert, commander of the H.M.S. Cornwall -- the frigate from which the British patrol had been deployed -- said the incident did not involve fighting or use of weapons."We've been assured from the scant communications that we've had from the Iranians at the tactical level that the 15 people are safely in their hands," he said.
Of course the British are calling for the immediate return of men and equipment but there has been no Iranian response of yet. I would not expect there to be for a couple of days because Iran is in the middle of a Religious holiday. Anyway please check out the map to see where this is happening!
http://www.cnn.com/...
Anyway In light of the fact that A former Iranian spy chief was suspected of defecting to the West, raising the prospect of a timely intelligence bonanza amid tensions with Teheran.
While the speculation is impossible to verify, it is hard to imagine a more tantalizing prospect for Western intelligence agencies than the defection of General Ali Reza Azkari, who is known to have served in Lebanon in the 1990s liaising with Hizbollah. He would also be a wealth of information as to the depth of Iranian involvement in Iraq.
That could be the case but after almost 3 weeks I have heard no word as to the status of General Azkari but Iran is ratcheting up the rhetoric that the U.S. has kidnapped him. With the increasing tensions on the Iraq Iran Border, increased tensions in Iraq as to Iranian involvement there, with American Fighter and tanker aircraft in place in Europe and the fact that we have discussed in the past that the navy in the Gulf would be doing its share to find an excuse for Bush to attack Iran, you have to wonder who was really at fault here and where this is going to lead?
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
