Bush tells us we'll win war! Islamist's tell their's they'll win! Who then will be the losers?

The war we fight today is more than a military conflict, it is the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century," Bush said at the start of the latest campaign to defend his war strategy ahead of the fall election and the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.
First I want to say that yes, we are in an ideological struggle. Yes we are fighting terrorism. That is what we should be concentrating on. That is what we should be dealing with.
As in every instance today, Bush has created an issue in order to practice the politics of division that he has used so well in his favor in the past. With his insistance of pushing his perverted policies throughout the entire world he has succeeded in making this a war between ideologies instead of a war only against terror "if you will"

Bush said years of pursuing stability in the Middle East was proven a mirage after Sept. 11, 2001. Now, only nations that commit themselves to freedom can help themselves and the rest of the world defeat terror.
You know the role the west has played in the Middle east not to speak of Africa, and the politics of division Bush has practiced around the world to further his new world order. His ideology is in direct contrast to the Islamist's and the ideology of a large part of the world that want to conduct themselves as they see fit not as Bush sees fit.
I guess I am a little confused. How did 9/11 prove middle east stability was a mirage? Our supposed successful divvying up of the middle east and Africa in good conscience is the mirage.

Bush said that regardless of the roots of the groups seeking to promote violence in the world, they are bound by one common bond -- to stop the progress of freedom. They will fail, he insisted.
I know we are in a war on so called terror that will be fought successful if we are to have a future, but says it's Chávez's desire to purchase weapons from Russia that threatens to destabilize the Andean region, not the $3 billion in military aid that Washington has provided to Colombia over the past five years.
In the Middle East, it is Syria's efforts to obtain purely defensive anti-aircraft missiles that pose a threat to that region, not the $1 billion a year in U.S. military aid to Israel.
On the nuclear front, while there is no evidence that Iran is intending to build nuclear weapons, it is the regime in Tehran that is threatening to further destabilize the region, not Bush's apparent pledge to support any future Israeli attack against Iran.Bush also recently pledged to support Israel if it decides to turn its U.S.-supplied weaponry against Iran.
Apparently though, Israel, India and Pakistan are permitted to possess nuclear weapons because they are allies of the United States, or so goes Bush administration logic.
The hypocrisy of the Bush administration is clearly evident in its targeting of alleged rogue states--Venezuela, Syria, Iran and North Korea--while supporting non-democratic and repressive regimes in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, among others.
The Bush administration's militaristic rhetoric and actions have not only resulted in increasing numbers of people around the globe viewing U.S. foreign policy as a significant destabilizing factor in international relations, it has also made clear exactly who is the world's principal warmonger. http://www.colombiajournal.org/....

Hijackers, suicide bombers and other terrorists all have the same objective, he said: "To turn back the advance of freedom and impose a dark vision of tyranny across the world."
Terrorist's have the common bond of stopping the progress of freedom?
Does that sound like the progress of freedom we were just talking about? Tyranny, that description best fits Bush as I read it:tyranny- an oppressive unjust government, cruel and unjust use of power or authority.
Bush with his politics of division has managed to turn this so called war on terrorism into a war of ideologies. The Islamist's on one side with their perverted vision on one side and Bush with his perverted version on the other side arming whoever he wants in order to attain his idea of a new world order. with the worlds innocents caught in the middle, it will be disastrous for much of the world. no winners. we will all be the losers!
If you can stand to read Bush's twisted speech, here it is. http://www.foxnews.com/....

James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www'anaveragepatriot.com