Sunday, January 15, 2006

We're overreacting? can that be possible with Iran?

President Bush has recently declared Iran to be a grave threat to world security. With 90 fighter bombers now within striking distance of Iran the President better be prepared to use them because we will be taken to task. We know Iran is a threat to the world but what happened to us not being the world’s policemen? We will do this if need be. And ground troops will be necessary in the end. Iran will also have the unity of its youth and the majority of its citizens against the west that has heretofore eluded them.
After 3 years and with tensions continuing to ratchet up between much of the so called civilized world and Iran we now have Iran trying to buy more time for their nuclear research , fuel enrichment program, and their various known and unknown nuclear activities. The other day Iran accused us of being back in the medieval period. Yester day that was changed to being accused of being in the Dark Ages. Today the U.S. and its supposed allies against a nuclear Iran are being accused of scientific apartheid and overreacting.
Iran is getting desperate in their refusal to cooperate and their desire to finish their nuclear capabilities before action is taken against them. Okay so it is scientific apartheid. Iran has shown for the safety of the world that it is necessary. With Iran’s professed desire to see the west destroyed, Israel wiped off the planet, and their insistence on nuclear testing, uranium enrichment, their refusal to cooperate, and their expressed desire to spread nuclear knowledge throughout very volatile Islam, just how can you over react to Iran’s actions as Iran claims?
James Joiner
gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com

No comments: