With Miers We have Bipartisanship well sort of

With merit and deservedly so, nothing Bush does and no decision he makes goes without extreme contention. As we all know this also applies to his recent nomination of Harriet Miers to replace Sandra Day Occonor as Supreme court justice. she has never been a judge as we know and has an almost zero track record on which to judge her on. This in itself is appearing to be a desired trait Bush looks for. She was head of the Texas Bar Association. She was a Lawyer for his Gubenatorial Campaign. As is usual for Bush as a reward she was then promoted to head the Texas lottery Commission once he took office. First we as average citizens have to be very concerned every time he does as he once again is saying trust me. Your first thought has to be oh no here we go again. He hasn't come through on anything yet that he has asked us to trust him on, only for the fundamentalist aand the rest of his supporters does he come thru. With her lack of a trail and experience one has to be very concerned that Bush himself has described her as a pit Bull. She's also been described as being able to slice and dice with the very best of them. She is too loyal to Bush which has proven to be a negative trait to the rest of us and much too inexperienced to be totally unbiased as we are told she will be. With the above stated traits being expressed from both sides of the aisle, her lack of experience, and her extreme required for promotion loyalty to Bush, both proponents and oponents Democrat and Republican are very concerned and rightly so. To finish off your dire need to be concerned is that the President went before the GOP and expressed to them that she is one of them. With their proven track record you should be scared be very scared.
James Joiner
Dover, NH
www.anaveragepatriot.com