Today no words just a pictograph of bush's nightmare Agenda ending with a comic video of the fool McCain who would finish it!

please look at this telling short comedic video Of McCain as it shows his promises to follow the nightmare scenario Bush has established http://www.sfgate.com/comics/fiore/



James Joiner

Gardner M

http://www.anaveragepatriot.com/

Today's examples of Bush ignoring our Laws as he wants and ignores the world in his endeavor to control everything!

Why does the world view us more positively? Bush just proved he is still the brain dead Decider thanking Romania for their 600 Iranian troops in Iraq!
Man! I was going to show the latest of Bush dispelling us and the world as he is the sole decider and does what he wants! But, knowing that I was very surprised to see that the world views us more favorably
I woke up this morning and everything was about the chief idiot discounting us and the world and circumventing the law whenever he feels like it! While he is backing the world into a corner that will lead to WW3 he continues to use the worn out excuse of fighting terrorism so he can take control of the world saying Trust me as he has proven he can not be trusted. I have to laugh because while thanking Romania for helping him in Iraq he thanked them for their 600 Iranian troops.

Bush said NATO allies need to recognize the seriousness of the anti-Taliban mission in Afghanistan and step up with more troops for the fight. He said the United States expects NATO member nations to "shoulder the burden necessary to succeed" in Afghanistan. The president welcomes announcements by some countries, including France, to provide additional troops. But he delicately is stepping around the request by the U.S. and others that nations relax rules that are keeping their troops from Afghanistan's most dangerous areas. Bush is making clear that more must be done.

He spoke alongside Romanian President Traian Basescu at a news conference Wednesday along a wind-whipped Black Sea beach, part of the presidential retreat in Neptun. Bush also renewed urgent calls Wednesday for NATO nations to allow Ukraine and Georgia to start the admission process into the alliance over Russian objections, and to counter Usama bin Laden's latest threats to Europe by stepping up their efforts in Afghanistan. Hoping to set the stage for a summit of leaders from the trans-Atlantic alliance here this week, Bush also said he remained committed to building a U.S. missile defense system in Europe fiercely opposed by Moscow, and that Washington would not endanger Iraq with precipitous U.S. troop withdrawals. On missile defense, Bush said the plans to base the shield in NATO members Poland and the Czech Republic were critical to defending against threats posed by rogue nations like Iran. He said U.S. intelligence shows that, "with continued foreign assistance," Iran could test an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching the U.S. and all of Europe "if it should choose to do so."

"The need for missile defense in Europe is real, and in my opinion, it is urgent," he said. "Today, we have no way to defend Europe against such an emerging threat, so we must deploy ballistic missile defenses that can help protect," he said.Bush will meet twice this week with outgoing Russian President Vladimir Putin. Moscow has cast doubt on the need for missile defense, but also has suggested that the U.S. should cooperate with Russia if it intends to proceed on a shield. Last summer, Putin proposed that the U.S. jointly use an early warning radar in Azerbaijan instead of a system based in Central Europe.Bush was complimentary of Putin's suggestions and expressed willingness to incorporate some. But even as he sought to ally Russian concerns, he suggested he would not abandon the core U.S. plan. "We believe these sites could be included as part of a wider threat monitoring system that could lead to an unprecedented level of strategic cooperation between Russia and the NATO alliance," the president said. "The missile defense capabilities we are developing are not designed to defend against Russia — just as the new NATO we are building is not designed to defend against Russia." Russia will fight this right to WW3
* Bush is an idiot but is fooling no one as his goal is to get as many countries on his side when his forever war does break out. The MDS is serving its main purpose of goading Russia into this war. On the home front as Bush controls us as he implements his mess The U.S. intelligence community sent its latest assessment of the situation in Iraq to Capitol Hill on Tuesday, according to congressional sources, but the findings will likely stay secret.

Iraq findings a friggen secret, what the hell is that?
* That blows me away! I refuse to believe the idiot can just do what he wants and ignore accountability to we the people. Worse! The Pentagon Tuesday made public a now-defunct legal memo that approved the use of harsh interrogation techniques against terror suspects, saying President Bush's wartime authority trumps any international ban on torture. The Justice Department memo, dated March 14, 2003, outlines legal justification for military interrogators to use harsh tactics against al Qaeda and Taliban detainees overseas -- so long as they did not specifically intend to torture their captives. Even so, the memo noted, the president's wartime power as commander in chief would not be limited by the U.N. treaties against torture. "Our previous opinions make clear that customary international law is not federal law and that the president is free to override it at his discretion," said the memo written by John Yoo, who was then deputy assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel. Bush's power trumps law

* Knowing that and the fact that, that worthless fence on a small part of the Mexican Border is another underhanded, corruptive, boondoggle we find that Bush can simply waive any laws in his way! The Department of Homeland Security will bypass environmental and land-management laws to build hundreds of miles of border fence between the United States and Mexico, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said Tuesday.

"These waivers will enable important security projects to keep moving forward." Chertoff cited a congressional requirement that 361 miles of fence be completed by the end of the year. He also pointed out that Congress had given him the authority to bypass laws. But the executive director of the Sierra Club, an environmental group, said the move "threatens the livelihoods and ecology of the entire U.S.-Mexico border region." "Secretary Chertoff chose to bypass stakeholders and push through this unpopular project on April Fools' Day. We don't think the destruction of the borderlands region is a laughing matter," said Carl Pope. The Sierra Club says the waivers will affect a range of federally protected lands, including national parks, monuments, wildlife refuges, forests and wilderness areas.

The Sierra Club says the waivers themselves are unconstitutional and has asked the Supreme Court to rule on the question. This is the fourth set of waivers issued by the department, and is the most sweeping. Chertoff's orders Tuesday affect two areas. First, the department proposes to place fencing, towers, sensors, cameras, detection equipment and roads along a 470-mile stretch of the border in California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. Second, it plans to integrate a concrete wall into proposed levee reinforcements along a 22-mile section of the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County, Texas. The department said it is committed to working in an environmentally sensitive manner and cooperating with resource agencies so it does as little damage as possible. Laws to be waived for 360 mile fence on a 470 mile border

** A 360 mile fence on a 470 mile border yeah that's security. They'll just walk around the boondoggle. I am sick of watching the Decider belittle us and the world as he endeavors to control us and implement his new societal and world order! You know where this is all headed. I have to wonder if that fence is to keep us in as we believe those FEMA concentration camps are for us the real enemy of this so called new order? this is all coming to a head and quick as Bush is speeding things up in his rush to get things done. Will we have a Democratic president? Will they be able to turn Bush's damage around? can they rescind his laws and override ant laws or treaties he has made in forming his new order? Will we ever get out from underneath his negative influence?

James Joiner
Gardner Ma
www.anaveragepatriot.com

Because of McCain we are having 100 years war debate involving Iraq, Bush has ensured a 100 years war of the world's at the very least!

John McCain is fighting back against what he calls distortions of his remarks on Iraq by potential Democratic opponent Barack Obama. The likely Republican presidential nominee responded Monday to Obama’s claims that McCain wants to wage a war in Iraq for 100 years. McCain has said he would be okay with the U.S. maintaining a presence in Iraq for 100 years. McCain says Obama clearly has no understanding of military history in the U.S. and how this country projects its spheres of influence.

“We fought a war with Japan and Germany. Afterwards we maintained a military presence there, which we are doing today. We fought a war in Korea, we maintained a military presence in Korea, which we are doing to this day. The first Gulf War, we threw Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait, and we have a military presence there to this day,” McCain told reporters aboard his campaign plane. “So he doesn’t either, hasn’t read or understand … the history of this country in warfare, and the way that we secure alliances and secure the peace. That’s through military government to government agreements that call for United States presence and mutual defense. Not only in that country itself, but also in the region. … So in all due respect, it displays a fundamental misunderstanding of history and how we’ve maintained national security, and what we need to do in the future to maintain our security in the face of the transcendent challenge of radical Islamic extremism. And I understand that because he has no experience or background in any of it,” McCain said.

The remarks about spending 100 years in Iraq occurred during a January town hall meeting in New Hampshire in which the Arizona senator said he’d be fine with a long-term U.S. commitment in Iraq. “President Bush has talked about our staying for 50 years, maybe 100. We’ve been in Japan for 60 years, in South Korea for 50 years or so. That would be fine with me as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or killed,” McCain said at the time. debate on 100 years in Iraq

* I hate to tell McCain but he is the one who does not have a clue. Past military History does not matter. This is no Germany! We are not talking about Korea! We are talking about the middle east. 100 years would be a gross under estimate. We are not talking just about Iraq or the middle east! Bush is doing his damnedest to ensure we have a 100 years world war!
In the past talking about President Medvedev Mr Putin was sharply critical of both Nato and Kosovo as he addressed reporters after his meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. As well as restating Russia's objections to independence for Kosovo, he also hit out at Nato enlargement, suggesting that as it grew, the alliance was seeking to make itself a substitute for the United Nations. "You get the impression that attempts are being made to set up an organization that would substitute for the UN," Mr Putin said, warning that if that happened "the potential for conflict would only increase". no Russian thaw no cooperation

** Despite knowing he is egging Russia towards world war what a coincidence. Today is April Fools Day and the Chief Fool pushes the drive towards world war a lot further! President Bush championed expansion of NATO further into the former Soviet Union on Tuesday and declared that Russia "will not have a veto" over the alliance's decision this week about whether to put Ukraine and Georgia on a path to membership.

Appearing alongside President Viktor Yushchenko, Bush portrayed NATO membership for the two former Soviet republics as part of a new security architecture for Europe and not a threat to Moscow, which has threatened to target missiles against its former territories if they join. Bush rejected Russian suggestions that he soft-pedal the issue in exchange for a deal on missile defense or Afghanistan. "I strongly believe that Ukraine and Georgia should be given MAPs," he said, referring to "membership action plans," a process for NATO candidates. "And there's no tradeoffs. Period. And I told that to President Putin." Recounting a recent telephone conversation, Bush said he told Russia's Vladimir Putin: "You shouldn't fear that, Mr. President. After all, NATO is an organization that is peaceful."

But the issue is highly sensitive for the Kremlin, which over the past decade has watched with increasing irritation as a Western alliance formed to oppose it during the Cold War has reached closer and closer to its borders. Over the past decade, NATO first admitted several Eastern European nations that were once satellites of Moscow and then, six years ago, gave membership to Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, the three Baltic states that were part of the Soviet Union until its breakup in 1991. Ukraine, in particular, has historically been a much more central part of the Russian sense of empire, which is why both nations consider this a critical moment in their mutual history. Yushchenko, the Western-oriented banker who was elected president after leading the Orange Revolution that toppled a pro-Russian government in late 2004, stressed that Ukraine needs NATO to ensure its final break from Moscow. Knowing Ukraine is central to Russia Bush push's for NATO membership

In a nutshell despite McCain quibbling over our past military exploits in regard to the 100 tears in Iraq statement I have to tell you that that is the very least of our worries on this fragile planet as Bush prepares to worsen it with his 100 years war of the worlds!

James Joiner
Gardner Ma
wwww.anaveragepatriot.com